Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Do We Still Need Women's History?

Feminist historian Alice Kessler-Harris has an article provocatively titled "Do We Still Need Women's History?" running in the Chronicle of Higher Education (which I can't, ahem, read because I don't have a dang subscription). But here's a tease:

In the spring of 2007, the Organization of American Historians (the nation's premier body of professional historians, teachers, and public advocates of U.S. history) asked me to take a look at what had changed in the profession with regard to the history of women and gender over the 100-year life span of the group. My findings would...

I'm guessing Kessler-Harris' answer to the question is a resounding YES. But if any of you with subscriptions out there want to put me out of my misery, do share! Or, of course, I could just finally the bullet and subscribe :)

And speaking of Women's History of course, which I for one adamantly believe we still need, in addition to traveling with an intergenerational feminist panel alongside some of my favorite feminist colleagues, [Shameless Plug Alert] I am currently booking speaking engagements solo for March 2008 (Women's History Month) based on my book, Sisterhood, Interrupted: From Radical Women to Grrls Gone Wild. If you are interested in bringing me to your campus or organization, please do get in touch soon, as my schedule is booking up! [Shameless Plug Ends]

1 comment:

Deborah Siegel said...

A thousand thanks to you out there who just sent me the unlocked link! Ever grateful, GWP