![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKdrlRVy8N5HVPh_hmkO2zOuS6_wppshznyNOOdHCbpx8-awLxvNlA3DcOAmm2pkDRSyPrPNu3Nox6GpV2bF3cL94vDe3I-smXBUb5SeAbf_tvgsqJ_Mlfw5wzjkAWW0BeB3jxOaL4HIE/s200/124284_t.jpg)
Straight from the gals at Broadsheet comes this annoyingly newsworthy tidbit: There has not been a woman author of a Shouts and Murmurs piece in The New Yorker for over three years. The last one was in 2004. Reports Catherine Price,
[W]e just found a link to a blog post from the World's Fair in which the author takes a break from his academic pursuits to examine the male-female breakdown of Shouts and Murmurs authors. (The post is arguably more amusing than most S&M columns.) His conclusion: "Out of the 133 authors of features under the Shouts and Murmurs banner (in the modern, post-1992 era), 17 have been women. That's 12.782%." To put it another way, men are represented in the section at a rate 8 times that of women.
Love that it was an academic who did the calculations. Hate that it's true. Wonder if , in addition to other (ahem) factors, women are submitting in smaller numbers, as they do when it comes to op-eds? That'd be interesting to find out. If anyone finds that out, please send a shout and a murmur over to G w/ P and we will broadcast the news far and wide.
No comments:
Post a Comment